| Home | Job | Pinball | Photo Album | Automotive | Press/Awards | Contact |
The Roman Space Telescope (RST)
The follow-on legacy of the Hubble Project
RST Mission Concept. Formerly called WFIRST (renamed May 2020).
On January 10 2021, I was
contacted by Dr.
Ed Cheng (note spelling), who is one of the
scientist working on RST. He wanted to know if I was
interested in starting a side project that involved
controlling LEDs for a in-flight calibration system for
the space telescope. It sounded simple enough and I
decided to give it a try. This calibration system
was for the main camera of RST, called the Wide
Field Instrument (WFI), which was/is being built by
Ball Aerospace. They subcontracted out the
calibration system, called the Relative Calibration System
(RCS) to SDL.
However, this system was behind schedule, and management
wanted to have a backup in case they did not
deliver. There was some political sensitivity, so
this side project would be in secret and us two Dr Eds
would work this quietly.
I designed and built a simple prototype, and found that my initial design concept was not going to work (using an LM117 as the current regulator). I learned from this and then switched to a more traditional op-amp based design and drew the schematic and did the simulation analysis. However, in April 2021, Ed told me the investigation we were doing was being cancelled as SDL showed good progress.
This changed again in June 2021 when SDL revealed at a monthly review to RST management that they were still behind schedule (they had been working on the RCS since Summer 2018). The SDL subcontract was cancelled, and I was tasked with resuming work on the design, which would now be renamed simplified RCS, or sRCS.
My role on sRCS would be as Electrical Lead, and I formed a small team of old friends. My alternate would be Roger Chiei, the FPGA and test GUI was built by Dr. Will Clement. Our electrical tech would be Ryan Fischer.
I designed and built a simple prototype, and found that my initial design concept was not going to work (using an LM117 as the current regulator). I learned from this and then switched to a more traditional op-amp based design and drew the schematic and did the simulation analysis. However, in April 2021, Ed told me the investigation we were doing was being cancelled as SDL showed good progress.
This changed again in June 2021 when SDL revealed at a monthly review to RST management that they were still behind schedule (they had been working on the RCS since Summer 2018). The SDL subcontract was cancelled, and I was tasked with resuming work on the design, which would now be renamed simplified RCS, or sRCS.
My role on sRCS would be as Electrical Lead, and I formed a small team of old friends. My alternate would be Roger Chiei, the FPGA and test GUI was built by Dr. Will Clement. Our electrical tech would be Ryan Fischer.
The electrical development team for sRCS. Left-right: Will, Roger, me.
The reason SDL could not
complete the design in the three preceding years was the
large dynamic range and stability needed in the
performance of the LED controller. Starting with a
clean slate, I proposed a much simpler design that would
be easier to package and build.
The main assembly house that was selected was the Peraton corporation in Beltsville, MD. That is the location of the image captured above. In addition to building the flight design
Since the digital interface between sRCS and the instrument is a simple serial connection, I reasoned it would be worth it to build a simulator to start our code development. That test is shown above, the commercial board that hosts our FPGA code is the very small board on the edge of the blue mat above. It communicates with the large gold box that is at the center. This test was initially not successful, but we found the error. This made this test very valuable and worth while.
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2023/goddard-team-builds-tests-calibrator-for-nasa-s-roman-in-record-timeThe main assembly house that was selected was the Peraton corporation in Beltsville, MD. That is the location of the image captured above. In addition to building the flight design
One of the first tests
we did was with the computer that the sRCS will talk
to once installed in the instrument. (Feb 2022).
to once installed in the instrument. (Feb 2022).
Since the digital interface between sRCS and the instrument is a simple serial connection, I reasoned it would be worth it to build a simulator to start our code development. That test is shown above, the commercial board that hosts our FPGA code is the very small board on the edge of the blue mat above. It communicates with the large gold box that is at the center. This test was initially not successful, but we found the error. This made this test very valuable and worth while.
After a short 9 months of work, we completed construction
of the Engineering Development Unit (EDU). March 2022.
The first unit built would
be the Engineering Development Unit (EDU) shown above on
the test bench. We had to make some small
modifications to tweak the design and this was done on the
three flight units that would follow.
Here we perform a complete EMI test on the non-flight units (September 2022).
In the image above we
assembled the complete non-flight system for an early EMI
test. You can see the sRCS electronics as the gold
box sitting on the copper bench on the right and this
powers the integrating sphere that contains the
LEDs. This sphere sits in a metal cage on the far
right of the copper table.
The test team doing the EMI test. The unit was so quiet that the
EMI team was impressed (September 2022).
I had the privilege of going to Hawaii to take delivery
of the LED sphere (October 2022).
More photos here in the Facebook album.
This is the unit we took delivery from Hawaii Aerospace.
Image released by NASA (October 2022).
The integrating sphere
above holds the 24 LEDs that comprise of the sRCS.
These LEDs are powered by the sRCS electronics. The
light is fired inwards and then come out of the gold cone
at the top. The shortest wavelength light emitted is
in the red color. So many of these cannot be seen by
the human eye.
We completed the thermal-vacuum test on the two Flight units. (Dec 2022).
Both flight units were
tested together in thermal-vacuum in the setup
above. We were able to confirm good operation over
the temperature that is expected on-orbit.
Delivery to Ball Aerospace (January 2023)
Additional photos here in Facebook album.
We took a break from work
and headed to Aruba
for the New Year holiday and then came back to ship
the system to Ball Aerospace in Boulder, CO. The
system was loaded onto a tractor trailer and was driven
without stop (two drivers) along with a chase car to
Boulder.
I am standing here next to the WFI in process of being built (January 2023).
The red glow in the middle of the instrument is the light from the sRCS.
Image released by Ball and NASA.
Image of the team is here
(I am standing on the right next to the Instrument)
We delivered the system
and oversaw the installation into the WFI instrument that
is being built in the cleanroom in Boulder. You can
see the two sRCS electronics units in the bottom part of
the instrument above.
The sRCS Electronics units have the team members' names engraved on the cover!
In this manner, we will go into space along with the instrument.
Image released by NASA.
As part of the functional test, we turned the LEDs on, and you can see the red glow in the image above. Note that it appears in a curved opening, and that is the outline of the imaging detector of the Instrument. It turns out that my daughter is the one building this detector. You can see this curved detector array in the logo of the mission that is engraved on the cover of the electronics unit.
After our successful delivery to Ball Aerospace, we are featured on the front page of NASA.gov.
The sRCS Electronics units have the team members' names engraved on the cover!
In this manner, we will go into space along with the instrument.
Image released by NASA.
As part of the functional test, we turned the LEDs on, and you can see the red glow in the image above. Note that it appears in a curved opening, and that is the outline of the imaging detector of the Instrument. It turns out that my daughter is the one building this detector. You can see this curved detector array in the logo of the mission that is engraved on the cover of the electronics unit.
After our successful delivery to Ball Aerospace, we are featured on the front page of NASA.gov.
My daughter Stephanie (background) also works on Roman. She is
building the main imaging chip array. Article on her work is
here at NASA.gov. Archive.
I mentioned how her work relates to mine in my keynote speech
at the 2022 Gala event for the Netherlands-America
Foundation in Washington DC.
One of the panels on the WFI Instrument will have the names
of the team members on it and will fly in space that way.
Image here.
A photo of the WFI instrument at Ball Aerospace / BAE Systems showing
the location of the panel. Here the top panel is the outside radiator.
You can see the panel with our names is the dark on on the left.
(Image release for public on 3/5/2024).
In October 2024, the project released
this video on the parts coming together on the
observatory. Click here
for that video.
In January 2025, this article was released of the Spacecraft Integrated Payload Assembly (SCIPA) integration. This joins the main spacecraft bus with the instrument and mirror assembly.
In January 2025, this article was released of the Spacecraft Integrated Payload Assembly (SCIPA) integration. This joins the main spacecraft bus with the instrument and mirror assembly.
NASA page on this mission